http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/9969670/Do-guns-make-women-any-safer.html
This article is a perfect example of the pathetic, helpless, slave minded, go-tell-the-teacher style culture programming which is covertly dished out to us. It is so ridiculous it made me laugh. The incredible lies passed off as informed perspective is absurd. Here we go,
"Since the gang rape and murder of a Delhi student last December there are reports of an upsurge in the number of women applying for gun licenses. Many of the applicants are professional women who want to take responsibility for their own safety because the police have failed to protect them."- the only bit of truth in the article I think. It goes on..
"National Crime Records Bureau provide figures indicating that one woman is raped every 20 minutes. "
"There is a justifiable feeling of fear and vulnerability amongst Indian women and tourists. However, is arming yourself against rape a realistic and viable defence? further research suggests that this is not the case. Women are more likely to be on the receiving end than pulling the trigger and the presence of a gun increases the chances of homicide." - because women are obviously far too frail and unable to handle a BIG SCARY loud firearm.
"The fact is a gun is far more likely to be used against the woman than used for her protection." - because the women would be incapable of defending herself when she has 17 rounds in the mag ready to punch holes through whatever they hit?!?..
"So let’s imagine you have kitted yourself out with your pink handgun, matching shoes and handbag. Would you actually be able to fire it? Apparently it’s not that easy. You need a day’s course at least in order to be able to handle it and fire with any degree of accuracy. Even then, to have a chance of hitting your target you need to be at very close range…a matter of a couple of yards." hahaha, this is laughable for any sane minded person. Or anyone who's actually fired guns before or been around them. - not saying I have, as I was born in a place where it is unusual not to be a happy and willing slave.
" I don’t mean to be facetious but the very idea of carrying a gun terrifies me. I would not feel safer with a lethal weapon on my person. I would feel scared. Scared that that gun would be used against me. Scared that it might go off accidentally. Scared that any violence might be escalated because of its presence." - what about the violence which will escalate for the soon-to-be rape or murder victim??? ever heard of the safety mechanism of a firearm??
"The problem in India will not be solved by women arming themselves. Yes some women have successfully defended themselves using firearms, but weapons are more likely to provide an illusion of security than the reality of it. Indeed carrying a weapon and falsely ‘feeling’ safe may put women in more danger than before."
So it's best to just lie back and think of Britain whilst you're being raped according to this lady.
Now if we take a trip to planet earth..
This is a gun which is unsuitable for a female to carry round ideally, but it doesn't mean to say they can't fire them. Any firearm with an awful lot of recoil is to be avoided by females, I agree. But to say that a female is safer without a firearm than with one is to defy logic and truth. It is typical of the british nature, the desired 'british' nature that the slave owners want them to have. A nation of people unable to stand up for themselves, forever needing the loving, caring police force to save the day for them. This starts early, when we're told in school, "if someone hits you, don't hit them back. go tell the teacher." This is the beginning of our domestication.
Who would a rapist rather try and rape, a girl with or without a gun on them? It's such a stupid fucking argument to make.
This young lady demolishes that piece of shit masquerading as a news article up top..
Only slaves are unable to own firearms. But we live as subjects here in Britain, which by definition, is under domination. So stating that we're slaves is only stating the obvious.
Why do the royals get armed guards to protect them whilst out in public? what makes it so that if I or you were to go out in public with so much as a stick to protect yourself you would be locked in a concrete box. This is very indicative of the nature of our rulers. And the fact that 99 percent of people don't really question this, is even more indicative of the nature of peoples indoctrination.
The violent crime rate in Europe is highest in this country. A country where only the ruling class and criminals are allowed to be armed. The lowest is Switzerland, where the population is extremely heavily armed. They have fully automatic rifles, grenades, RPG's.. what does that say about the relationship the government has with it's people? the fact that it trusts people to have such power. The disgusting crime family which controls Britain and has invaded most of the world obviously wants their human livestock to be disarmed. It doesn't take two brain cells to figure out why.
Official info of what to do in event of rape - lie back and think if Britain. If able to dial 999, do so. Wait about 30-40 mins, perhaps think of britain a bit more whilst waiting?
Makes me sick.
No comments:
Post a Comment